Urias1 Alexis Urias Professor Abubo English 201 25 July 2018 Animal Testing Research Paper 100 million animals are killed every year due to companies experimenting their products on these innocent creatures

Urias1
Alexis Urias
Professor Abubo
English 201
25 July 2018
Animal Testing Research Paper
100 million animals are killed every year due to companies experimenting their products
on these innocent creatures. These animals are being used for testing all in the name of science,
subjected to poor laboratory conditions which impact their well being. ?Animals such as rats,
mice, and bunnies are locked away in small cold cages. They are in pain and are alone just
waiting in fear for the next procedure, like burning their skin, that will be performed on them.
Many of these animals often die because they are being tested with toxic chemicals, drugs, food,
and cosmetics that are detrimental to their health and in most cases ends up leading to death for
them. The most common animals that are being tested ? include mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea
pigs, hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates (monkeys,
and in some countries, chimpanzees). ?There is a traditional assumption that animals respond the
same way that humans do when exposed to certain products which is why scientists conduct test
on them in an effort to know more about human reactions. These animals are victims to
experiments that assess the safety of cosmetic, personal care, household products, chemicals,
medical devices, and their component ingredients. The reactions vary by species, and it makes it
difficult to collect data and apply them to humans when exposed to these products. As a result,
animal testing can fail to protect humans by harmful products.
According to Susan Scutti, from Medical Daily, animals were first used by scientist for

Urias2
anatomical curiosity. This started with early Greek physicians experimenting on animals. This
can also be seen with Ibn Zuhr, an Arab physician of the 12 ?th
?
century who made surgical
procedures on animals first before conducting them on human patients. During that period,
scientist would perform these experiments for public use. A live animal would be cut open and
each organ would be displayed so that students’ could examine the function of organs. In the
20th century, pharmaceutical drug testing increased became important in countries like the
United States. Diethylene glycol (DEG) was a drug used to treat streptococcal infections. DEG
was poisonous to humans, however, an unknown chemist would sell it to humans as an elixir.
This lead to more than a hundred deaths. In the wake of this disaster the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetics Act. This Act required the testing of drugs on animals before they were able to be sold
(Scutti, Susan).
Animal testing has also been viewed as a global issue. The European Parliament is close
to a confrontation with European Union governments over the issue of animal testing of
cosmetics and their ingredients. They quote “Parliament's influential environment committee has
voted overwhelmingly to ban the testing of cosmetic products on animals by the end of 2004 and
to prohibit the marketing of cosmetics that have been submitted to animal tests within five years.
The committee's decision is likely to be backed by a plenary session of the parliament later this
month” (EU Parliament). This show influential leaders across the globe are trying to get
coverage and stop the cruelty of animal testing that has been going on due to a lot of people not
being aware and not taking a stance on this immoral issue.
Animal testing is also a local problem. This is a problem locally within cities in the
United States, as well as other states. According to PETA ” ?All institutions that receive federal

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Urias3
grants for animal experiments must be registered with the National Institutes of Health. A list of
all the universities and companies that receive taxpayer money for experiments on animals can
be found ?here ? (click on the state that you want at the top)”. ? With the list that PETA provides you
can see how many cities actually do testing on animals. There are many cities that are really
close to the Imperial Valley. Luckily we do not have one here in the Imperial Valley.
After so many years animal testing is still being done today, and is hardly
regulated. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only law that the United States has in
protecting animals from being tested. This act only has minimal protection, and it does not
protect cold blooded animals from being tested on. This act applies to either live or dead dogs,
cats, primates, guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits, or other warm-blooded animals that are to be for
research or exhibition, or used as a pet. The animals that are excluded from this act are fish,
reptiles, and amphibians, as well as farm animals like cows and pigs. The USDA is the only
agencies in charge with enforcing the AWA. Business and individuals using animals have to be
licensed or registered with the USDA. Having just one agency can lead to oversight that could be
costly to the animals being tested on.
For example, rabbits are one of the most common animal that are being tested for
cosmetics. They are frequent victims of animal experimenters because they are hardly agressive,
easy to handle, to keep and as well as to breed. Hundred thousands of these rabbits are abused in
U.S laboratories every year. Despite the availability of more modern, humane, and effective
different way to test cosmetics, rabbits are still tormented in test, such as the Draize eye irritancy
test. PETA states “which cosmetics, dishwashing liquid, drain cleaner, and other substances are
dripped into the animals’ eyes ?, often causing redness, swelling, discharge, ulceration,

Urias4
hemorrhaging, cloudiness, or blindness.” These rabbits are then killed after the experiment is
over. The testing doesn’t stop here because even after rabbits are killed experiments are
conducted on their skin.
There are several organizations that are fighting for animals to have rights. One of them
as many people know is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). They are one of
the largest animal organizations in the world, with more than 3 million members and supporters.
PETA focuses on factory farms, clothing trade, in laboratories, and in entertainment industry.
They also work on the killings of beavers, birds, and other “pests” as well as to domesticated
animals. PETA works through animal rescues, cruelty investigators, celebrities, and protest.
Another animal right activist group is Best Friends Animal Society organization whose
mission is for no pet to be homeless, create a better home for animals, to treat all living things
how humans would want to be treated, and to have compassion and respect for all living
creatures. Best Friend Animal Society started about 34 years ago, that was created by a group of
people that had one goal in common. Best Friend Animal Society states “it was simply about
doing the right thing for creatures who could not speak or act on their own behalf”. This
organization aimed towards having all animals in good and loving homes, and for them to
receive the love and respect that all animals need. They gave a voice to all animals, due to the
fact that animals cannot really communicate with humans and do not have a choice on whether
they want to get tested on or not.
A ?nother organization that has taken a stand would be the British animal rights activists.
They have taken their campaigns all the way to Asia ?. They state ?"The aim of this was to
embarrass the Japanese research industry and government because of Japan's involvement with

Urias5
Huntingdon Life Sciences”(SHAC). Huntingdon Life Science is an organization is an animal
testing facility. It is said that they are the largest organization that test on animal for various
different things, such as diet pills, detergents, tanning lotions etc. The British Animal Rights
Activists are trying to make animal testing become an awareness and let people around the world
know that animals are dying because of us. They want people to know that they have lives just
like us and that they do matter no matter how small or big they are.
There are many cruelty free companies now. These companies are considered cruelty free
because they use products that have been known to be safe on humans for many years. These
companies will usually have a label that say “no animal testing”, “cruelty-free”, or they will have
a bunny logo on their product. Peta states that “A company that is interested in having its name
added to our cruelty-free list(s) must complete a short questionnaire and sign a statement of
assurance”. This means that if a company wants to be verified cruelty free has to go thru this
method stating that they do not test on animals. Some companies that still test on animals are;
Lysol, Clorox, Febreze, Head & Shoulders, Chapstick, IAMS dog food, Johnson & Johnson, and
the list goes on. On the PETA website you can search up a brand and see if they are on their
cruelty free list or not.
Now, some scientists are using cellular models to test products on. Cellular models are a
type of human tissue, and one way to obtain these cells is to induce pluripotent stem cells. These
are made from adults’ tissues such as skin or blood that are reprogrammed into stem cells that
can become any type of cell in the body. This is useful for scientist because it shows how a
specific drug can react with a human body, and to see how the cell can respond. Not only is this
more realistic, it also helps the cells to thrive. This is also a great local solution to propose to all

Urias6
the Universities and local companies that are testing on innocent animals.
According to PETA tax dollars are being thrown away to pointless experiments. For
example, we already know that smoking cigarettes can be harmful to a growing fetus, however,
that doesn’t stop the federal government from funneling more than $10 million to Eliot Spindel
of the Oregon National Primate Research Center. What Spindle does is get primates impregnated
and inject them with nicotine. The nicotine that causes damages to the developing fetus’ lungs,
but not only does he leave it at that. He also cuts the preterm babies from their mothers and kills
them for their organ to be dissected. PETA also mentioned that “Yale University squandered
nearly $10 million from the National Institute of Health for nicotine, amphetamine, and cocaine
addiction substances to be tested on mice, rats, and monkeys” (PETA). These people could be
using actual human smokers so they can find out what happens to an actual human body, but
instead they would much rather harm an innocent life that cannot defend itself. These animals are
forcefully being addicted to drugs that we know causes harmful effects to a human body, and this
was not found by testing them on animals. Humans found out how drugs affect them because
humans are voluntarily taking these drugs and getting addicted to them themselves. Federal tax
dollars should be spent funding addiction treatment centers and studying drug addictions in
humans in a clinical setting rather than torturing poor defenseless animals.
Also, animal testings can be proven to lead to inaccurate effects, so why do testing on
animals. The testing environment skews the results. An essential part of conducting a viable
experiment is to allow for only one variable. However, the testing environment is in and of itself
a variable not accounted for. According to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society, “stress,
routinely experienced by animals in labs, negatively influences the reliability of animal research

Urias7
data. Stress influences heart rate, pulse, blood pressure, muscular activity, and hormone levels
and can modify the normal values of these variables significantly” (Limitations and Dangers).
The research environment is therefore interfering with the animal's’ normal body functions. If
normality cannot be established, then a change from the normal state cannot be quantified either.
Stress is not the only affected factor, “In one study, researchers discovered that not only is stress
a common factor for mice in labs—just having a researcher present can alter a mouse’s
behavior—but they also experience ‘sympathy pains’ for the mice surrounding them. ‘In other
words, seeing another mouse in distress elevates the amount of distress the onlooker displays'”
(Limitations and Dangers). The research environment makes the mice actively behave differently
than they would whether they are by themselves or with other mice.
These creatures are defenseless and cannot protect themselves against us humans. ?There
is no need for us to be testing on animals because studies have shown that they react differently
compared to humans. There are substances that animals do not react to but if a human consumes
they can react to it, or vice versa. For example, chocolate, everyone loves chocolate but
chocolate is harmful to some animals. A dog cannot consume chocolate because it will cause
them to get heartworms, and other complications.
All in all, animal testing should be illegal, there are so many alternatives for testing
products Defenseless animals should not be in pain or agony; they should enjoy their life in their
natural habitats, and let Mother Nature take its course. Animals are beautiful creatures and
humans should not take them for advantage. Humans and animals should live at peace with each
other. Humans need to be more aware of what embodies animal testing and how it can negatively
impact animals.

Urias8
Work Cited

Animal Testing 101. (n.d). Retrieved from http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-
experimentation/animal-testing-101/

Animal Welfare Act. (n.d). Retrieved from https://awionline.org/content/animal-welfare-act

Burrel, Teal. (August 07, 2013). Can We Eliminate Animals from Medical Research? Retrieved
from ?http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/body/eliminating-animal-models/

“History of Best Friends.” ?Best Friends Animal Society ?, 28 Feb. 2018,
bestfriends.org/about-best-friends/our-story/history-best-friends.

“Is There an Animal Laboratory in Your City?” ?PETA ?, 2018,
www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/colleges/.
“Limitations and Dangers.” NEAVS. Web. 10 Nov. 2013.

“PETA's Beauty Without Bunnies Program.” ?PETA ?,
www.peta.org/about-peta/learn-about-peta/info-businesses/beauty-without-bunnies-progr
am/.

Scutti, Susan. (June 27,2013). Animal Testing A long, Unpretty History. Retrieved from
http://www.medicaldaily.com/animal-testing-long-unpretty-history-247217

“Rabbits in Laboratories.” ?PETA ?,
www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/rabbits-laboratories/ ?.

“Tax Dollars Thrown Away on Pointless Animal Experiments.” ?PETA ?, 14 Oct. 2013,
www.peta.org/blog/tax-dollars-thrown-away-pointless-animal-experiments/.