Aristotle and Plato defined the morality as a type of interpretation

Aristotle and Plato defined the morality as a type of interpretation. they attempted to give fundamental facts of moral and civil virtues by likening one ethical principle to the others to summarise the main impression of moral as personal happiness. Dworkin 2011 contemporary philosophers also use the words “moral and ethical” in a different way, they represent moral values how we ought to treat others and how we ought to live ourselves Dworkin 2011. the western philosophers typically they divided ethics theory into three different theoretical categories; “meta-ethics, normative ethics and applied ethics”.
.Meta-ethics; deals with the sort of moral judgement. it stares at the origins and application of ethical principles by focusing the character of individual feel. Normative ethics; deal with the “content of moral judgements” and the rules for what is “right or wrong”. this may include the consequence of our actions such as our duties and our good habits towards others..
Applied ethics; look at controversial issues and typically divided into diverse fields. for instant “professional, biomedical and environmental ethics. etc.the above three theories of ethics contribute to part of the “decision-making” framework for decision making when ethics are in play these principles represent the aspects from which individuals seek support as they make decisions. every theory highlights diverse points for a different decision-making method or a decision rule such as predicting the outcome and following one’s duties to others in order to reach what the individual considers is an ethically right decision. in order to understand ethical decision-making it is important for us to understand that not everyone makes decisions in the same way by using the same message or applying the same decision rules. historically in the philosophy of ethics, there are also four critical principles of ethics such as respect for autonomy which means to respect others` choices and human dignity. beneficence brings about good in every action justice is the obligation to treat others` equally and fairly and non-maleficence which controls the amounts of harm caused. furthermore, there are different classes of ethical philosophies to discuss ethical issues. such as deontology utilitarianism social justice social contract theory virtue ethical theory and right. these are included with another important perspective such as feminist perception of ethics and general perspective of justice in order to understand further an ethical principle. the purpose of this paper is to look over and compare the Aristotle and Immanuel Kant’s theories of ethics in terms of their judgmental applications to actions of the good life